|
For the purpose of colouring clear soups,
however, there is nothing in the world to compare with what
French cooks call caramel. Caramel is really burnt
sugar. There is a considerable art in preparing it, as it is
necessary that it should impart colour, and colour
only. When prepared in the rough-and-ready manner of
burning sugar in a spoon, as is too often practised in English
kitchens, this desideratum is never attained, as you are bound
to impart sweetness in addition to a burnt flavour. The
simplest and by far the most economical method of using caramel
is to buy it ready-made. It is sold by all grocers under the
name of Parisian Essence. A small bottle, costing about
eightpence, will last a year, and saves an infinite loss of
time, trouble, and temper.
By far the most economical soups are the
thick, where all the ingredients can be rubbed through a wire
sieve. Thick soups can be divided into two classes—ordinary
brown soup, and white soup. The ordinary brown is the most
economical, as in white soups milk is essential, and if the
soup is wished to be very good it is necessary to add a little
cream.
Soups owe their thickness to two processes.
We can thicken the soup by adding flour of various kinds, such
as ordinary flour, corn-flour, &c., and soup can also be
thickened by having some of the ingredients of which it is
composed rubbed through a sieve. This class of soups may be
called Purées. For instance, Palestine
soup is really a purée of Jerusalem artichokes;
ordinary pea
soup is a purée of split peas. In making our
ordinary vegetarian soups of all kinds, as a rule, all the
ingredients should be rubbed through a sieve. The economy of
this is obvious on the face of it. In the case of thickening
soup by means of some kinds of flour, for richness and
flavour there is nothing to equal ordinary flour that has
been cooked. This is what Frenchmen call roux.
As white
and brown roux are the very backbone of vegetarian
cookery a few words of explanation may not be out of place.
On referring to the recipe for making white and brown roux,
it will be seen that it is simply flour cooked by means of
frying it in butter, In white roux each grain of flour is
cooked till it is done. In brown roux each grain of flour is
cooked till it is done brown. We cannot exaggerate the
importance of getting cooks to see the enormous difference
between thickening soups or gravy with white or brown roux
and simply thickening them with plain butter and flour. The
taste of the soup in the two cases is altogether different.
The difference is this. Suppose you have just been making
some pastry—some good, rich, puff paste—you have got two
pies, and, as you probably know, this pastry is simply
butter and flour. Place one pie in the oven and bake it till
it is a nice rich brown. Now taste the pie-crust. It is
probably delicious. Now taste the piece of the pie that has
not been baked at all. It is nauseous. The difference is—one
is butter and flour that has been cooked, the other is
butter and flour that has not been cooked.
|